Who is he?
Brother in law of Thaksin, a former judge and justice minister. Thailand's new Prime Minister and the first Thai PM whose name I pronounced correctly at the first attempt.
What happened to the previous PM?
Samak Suntarajev was another victim of the battle between the (democratic) executive and the (undemocratic) judiciary. He was found to have been in dereliction of duty by appearing on a TV cooking show whilst serving as PM. In reality, Samak accepted no payment. His driver was given 4,000 baht, which would probably be less than the PM kept in his back pocket for a trip to the Seven Eleven. Samak loves cooking and his appearance on the show would be no different to a UK MP who liked football appearing on "A Question of Sport".
The guilty charge removed Samak but left him open for reappointment. However, factional infighting led to a new appointment.
Will Somchai make a good PM?
In theory, yes. He is very different to Samak in his smooth style of speaking and modern style of presentation and mannerisms. He is intelligent, progressive and experienced.
So things are looking up?
Not necessarily. The PAD have already stated their case by demanding Somchai brings back Thaksin. The PAD surely know full well that Thaksin's brother in law will never bring him back. Likewise, the symbolic significance of appointing Thaksin's brother in law lends crEdence to the theory that the whole ongoing saga is a war of attrition between Thaksin Shiniwat and old elitists such as Privy Councillor General Prem.
It doesn't matter how many times you swallow the same remedy, if the diagnoses is wrong, you still get sick. Somchai Wongsawat is a capable PM, but he - like Samak - will be unable to achieve much as the warring factions - some visible, some not - continue to fight.
Politics is exhausting me. I think I'll return to my teacher's diary.
Showing posts with label Samak Sundaravej. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samak Sundaravej. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Friday, September 05, 2008
Students being students
Part of student life is finding an identity for yourself and giving yourself a reason to exist. For some (like me) that can mean attaching yourself to a certain type of music culture. For others it can mean finding a cause to support, often a perceived moral cause so you can imagine you have some high ground. This is a natural stage that we all go through and in any country, student politics can be a powerful and important movement.
That said, the latest student protests in Thailand have a farcical ring to them.
A look at the photos on the home page of The Nation tells the story. In the last week we've seen student group after student group melodramatically protesting the state of emergency, comments by the education minister and now a wave of protests calling for Samak to resign. This bandwagon has been jumped on now only because the international media are watching and Samak is under pressure. The students have decided they want some attention now, but when the PAD protests first began, the student response was minimal. The student shootings were tragic, but the wave had begun just before this happened.
What's more, inviting school children up on stage to tell Samak to resign seems in bad taste.
Here's one more thought: if you were a person of influence watching the events in Bangkok, what would you tell the people? If you supported democracy you could tell the PAD they were wrong and things should be resolved peacefully. If you were neutral, you could say the same thing. But what if you supported the PAD, but could not be seen to be condoning their actions? I guess you'd have to stay quiet.
That said, the latest student protests in Thailand have a farcical ring to them.
A look at the photos on the home page of The Nation tells the story. In the last week we've seen student group after student group melodramatically protesting the state of emergency, comments by the education minister and now a wave of protests calling for Samak to resign. This bandwagon has been jumped on now only because the international media are watching and Samak is under pressure. The students have decided they want some attention now, but when the PAD protests first began, the student response was minimal. The student shootings were tragic, but the wave had begun just before this happened.
What's more, inviting school children up on stage to tell Samak to resign seems in bad taste.
Here's one more thought: if you were a person of influence watching the events in Bangkok, what would you tell the people? If you supported democracy you could tell the PAD they were wrong and things should be resolved peacefully. If you were neutral, you could say the same thing. But what if you supported the PAD, but could not be seen to be condoning their actions? I guess you'd have to stay quiet.
Friday, August 29, 2008
Three reasons why the PAD protest has backfired
So I've finally found a "spot the difference" caption for Thai and UK politics.
Pictured above are members of the People's Alliance "for" Democracy. Their faces are covered as they smash their way into a TV station to protest against a democratically elected government. Also pictured are the Unite "Against" Fascism group as they force their way into Oxford Union to protest against the private Union's decision to invite certain people to a private debate.
The only difference between these groups is that the PAD were once a force for good.
Why have the PAD gone bad?
1) It has not achieved its stated objective.
The PAD has repeatedly stated its demands for Samak to resign, but the ogre-faced one is not only still there, he is actually increasing in terms of popularity. The other - unstated - goal of the PAD is to create so much fear and chaos that the army sweep in with another coup. But Anupong has kept close to Samak and there have been no signs of it happening.
2) Its fascist behaviour is losing it support.
The moment that some PAD members with covered faces smashed in the doors to NBT TV and stormed the station, people began to condemn the group. The violence and wish for bloodshed was becoming obvious.
On a personal note, the bandanna clad PAD members behaving like animals reminded me of the UAF in England during their protests at Oxford Union. The irony was obvious - a group that calls itself the 'People's Alliance for Democracy' behaving in a most undemocratic manner, and a group that calls itself 'Unite Against Fascism' behaving like fascists. Misnomers that are not lost on the public at large.
3) It is actually increasing the popularity and perceived independence of Samak Suntarajev.
Samak's calmness and patience during this fiasco is exactly what the PAD did not want. They wanted him to react angrily and threaten force, or start talking about Thaksin. His restraint has won him support. Even the Thai police have come through this looking good so far. You know you're doing badly if you make the Thai police look good. (I have permission to say that).
The PAD used this protest as a big 'final push', an all or nothing effort to oust the PPP regime. The plan so far has not worked and the increasing desperation and paranoia of the group is becoming obvious. Journalists being attacked and threats from Chamlong's scheduled replacement Panlop that "non peaceful means" will be used to resolve the situation if he takes over are a sure giveaway that the PAD want bloodshed to occur. It's their last chance.
But it is not over yet. It's a tense and intriguing situation. Sondhi and Chamlong still look genuinely relaxed and retain the support of some middle class Thais, senators and a small minority of officials and military. Rail unions have called a strike in a show of PAD support and the court have cancelled the eviction order. Samak is under huge pressure. But with Samak's decision to turn the protest into a war of attrition, it's hard to see how the PAD can come out on top unless the police lose patience and decide to move in and arrest the leaders. If that happens and the people fight back, there could be deaths and there could be a coup. For the sake of Thailand, let's hope that doesn't happen.
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
The judiciary stuns the government
You read it here just days before the new wave of big stories. In fact, I was so spot on that just eight days after my blog, Samak highlighted the issue himself.
And now we have the SC decision upholding the charges against Youngyuth of vote fraud.
The comminque by foreign minister Noppadom concerning Preah Vihear is declared unconstitutional. (The cabinet could be impeached by the 49% appointed senate).
And health minister Chaiya Sasomsup disqualified from his post by the Constitutional Court.
It's also worth noting the former charge was initiated by the Election Commission and the later by the post -Thaksin NCCC line up.
The courts are now reeling off a series of verdicts on various cases that is heaping pressure on the government and there are more to come. The ongoing charges against Thaksin and his family could change the face of Thai politics.
Judges in Thai courts are selected by a Judicial Commission panel of senate appointed experts (remember the senate is 49% appointed itself) and serving judges. The choices must be submitted to His Majesty the King for formal selection and approval. The junta of 2007 increased the retirement age of judges to sixty five and oversaw the dissolution trial of Thai Rak Thai.
And now we have the SC decision upholding the charges against Youngyuth of vote fraud.
The comminque by foreign minister Noppadom concerning Preah Vihear is declared unconstitutional. (The cabinet could be impeached by the 49% appointed senate).
And health minister Chaiya Sasomsup disqualified from his post by the Constitutional Court.
It's also worth noting the former charge was initiated by the Election Commission and the later by the post -Thaksin NCCC line up.
The courts are now reeling off a series of verdicts on various cases that is heaping pressure on the government and there are more to come. The ongoing charges against Thaksin and his family could change the face of Thai politics.
Judges in Thai courts are selected by a Judicial Commission panel of senate appointed experts (remember the senate is 49% appointed itself) and serving judges. The choices must be submitted to His Majesty the King for formal selection and approval. The junta of 2007 increased the retirement age of judges to sixty five and oversaw the dissolution trial of Thai Rak Thai.
Monday, July 07, 2008
Unruly TV stations and mad doctors
PTV is a TV station set up by affiliates of Thai Rak Thai and PPP (People Power Party) initially to voice opposition to the junta, and now to counter the reasonably successful campaign by the PAD (People's Alliance for Democracy). The PAD are led by Sonthi Limthongkul who is the owner of ASTV. As such, ASTV supply almost 24 hour coverage to PAD activities. The PPP obviously see the resurrection of PTV (it was closed down for unclear reasons during the junta's rule) as the ideal counter strike.
There's just one problem. It is a blatant and shameless constitutional breech. One of the (few) plus points of the new constitution is that it clearly states people in positions of political power cannot hold a financial interest in any media outlet. It's a progressive, positive rule.
So how can Chaturon (former TRT leader) and Jakrapob get away with this?
The Nation:
Great, so it's goverened by a group that does not yet exist and, if the National Telecom Commission is comparable, will not exist for some time yet.
Still, hopefully someone will lodge a complaint with the Constitutional Court.
*************
Another interesting side show is Democrat MP Malinee Sukwenworakij's bizarre rant in Parliament claiming that Samak suffered mental deficiency. MP Malinee claimed that Samak's behaviour such as glaring at reporters displayed evidence of mental sickness. Malinee went so far as to hold up a book entitled "Sick people that ruled the world" (Samak hardly rules the world does he?) which apparently includes Hitler as one of its case studies.
Samak rightly responded that her medical licence should be reviewed as no doctor should be diagnosing people in Parliament.
Malinee responded by claiming she was speaking from personal opinion. If that was so, why did she need to cite her qualification as a doctor to back up her arguments? I doubt many medics want to be dragged into the circus of Thai politics and I personally would not want a GP who is so childish as to do such things. I have no love for Samak and I wonder myself if he is not a cymbal short of a drumkit, but Dr Malinee is just as bad.
There's just one problem. It is a blatant and shameless constitutional breech. One of the (few) plus points of the new constitution is that it clearly states people in positions of political power cannot hold a financial interest in any media outlet. It's a progressive, positive rule.
So how can Chaturon (former TRT leader) and Jakrapob get away with this?
The Nation:
Amid growing pressure from PTV's opponents to ban the station's broadcasts, Phachern Khampho said such authority actually lies with the National Broadcasting Commission, which will be established in the near future.
Great, so it's goverened by a group that does not yet exist and, if the National Telecom Commission is comparable, will not exist for some time yet.
Still, hopefully someone will lodge a complaint with the Constitutional Court.
*************
Another interesting side show is Democrat MP Malinee Sukwenworakij's bizarre rant in Parliament claiming that Samak suffered mental deficiency. MP Malinee claimed that Samak's behaviour such as glaring at reporters displayed evidence of mental sickness. Malinee went so far as to hold up a book entitled "Sick people that ruled the world" (Samak hardly rules the world does he?) which apparently includes Hitler as one of its case studies.
Samak rightly responded that her medical licence should be reviewed as no doctor should be diagnosing people in Parliament.
Malinee responded by claiming she was speaking from personal opinion. If that was so, why did she need to cite her qualification as a doctor to back up her arguments? I doubt many medics want to be dragged into the circus of Thai politics and I personally would not want a GP who is so childish as to do such things. I have no love for Samak and I wonder myself if he is not a cymbal short of a drumkit, but Dr Malinee is just as bad.
Monday, June 30, 2008
The executive vs the judiciary?
Obviously by "executive" I mean the Prime Minister and his cabinet, not the de facto Head of State, HM King Bhumipol.
Casual observers could be forgiven for raising an eyebrow at Thailand's judiciary over the last month or so. After all, it was highly impressive for the Supreme Court to wrap up the "cake" (see what I did there?) case so quickly and with a conviction at that. And then, no sooner had they done that, the Administrative Court ordered an injunction against further action in the ongoing dispute of land around Preah Vihear which happened to be big news at the time.
But there is more interesting background to this situation. Thailand's court system is similar to the UK model. The administrative courts are those of the first instance and are the Criminal and Civil courts. Next up is the Appeals Court and then the Supreme Court. The Constitutional Court is a separate body with a different selection procedure.
The judiciary have been prominent in Thailand's political roller coaster for some time. Ever since the Constitutional Court's narrow decision in favour of Thaksin Shiniwat upon his taking of office in 2001, weary eyes have been cast between the legislative, executive and judiciary. Perhaps none more so than during the CC's decision to nullify the election of April 2006. The brave decision was made shortly after members of the Election Commission had been sentenced to jail for dereliction of duty by the Criminal Court.
After the coup of '06, Jakrapob Penkair claimed to have telephone recordings that exposed interference in the Court's decision to convict the EC commissioners. Penkair claimed the recording implied interference by Privy Councillor Prem Tinsulanonda.
Also after the coup, it was highly conspicuous that the junta ordered constitution increased the retirement age for court judges and changed the selection process for judges (a move which the Samak government have attempted to reverse).
Not long after the draft constitution began to take shape, the Constitutional Court disbanded the Thai Rak Thai party in a move which some claimed was politically motivated (however, the decision was certainly just).
And now, with many of the corruption charges against Thaksin and his family seemingly taking an eternity to reach court by moving steadily, the pastry gate scandal and the Preah Vihear temple affair have been resolved quickly.
What to make of this? It can't help but be noticed that the pastry gate affair, the PV temple affair and the PAD protests (which the court also made a decision on today) almost form a script for the next junta to use:
"In the interests of national security, the Council for the Protection of the Kingdom of Thailand with HM The King as Head of State has no decision but to step in and prevent the sale of Thai land by the People Power Party. Due to the protests lead by the PAD and the attempted interference in the judicial process by dark forces, we believe this decision is the only way to prevent Thai land being sold by dark forces, against the will of the people and the constitution of Thailand".
It must be noted however that the Courts of Thailand - particularly the Constitutional Court - have an image of being cleaner that the other two branches of government. Looking back, I can think of only one decision that appeared to disagree with my amateur understanding of Thai law. That case would be the Thaksin Shiniwat asset concealment case and, interestingly, a judge later admitted he had been "unsuccessfully lobbied" during that case. However, it is open to speculation as to how much influence and pressure is applied to the courts and by whom.
Whatever the reasons, expect the judiciary to continue to play a pivotal role as the ongoing political saga continues over the coming months. It gives me no pleasure to say that I predict a coup - with a speech resembling the example I just gave - around Christmas time this year.
Casual observers could be forgiven for raising an eyebrow at Thailand's judiciary over the last month or so. After all, it was highly impressive for the Supreme Court to wrap up the "cake" (see what I did there?) case so quickly and with a conviction at that. And then, no sooner had they done that, the Administrative Court ordered an injunction against further action in the ongoing dispute of land around Preah Vihear which happened to be big news at the time.
But there is more interesting background to this situation. Thailand's court system is similar to the UK model. The administrative courts are those of the first instance and are the Criminal and Civil courts. Next up is the Appeals Court and then the Supreme Court. The Constitutional Court is a separate body with a different selection procedure.
The judiciary have been prominent in Thailand's political roller coaster for some time. Ever since the Constitutional Court's narrow decision in favour of Thaksin Shiniwat upon his taking of office in 2001, weary eyes have been cast between the legislative, executive and judiciary. Perhaps none more so than during the CC's decision to nullify the election of April 2006. The brave decision was made shortly after members of the Election Commission had been sentenced to jail for dereliction of duty by the Criminal Court.
After the coup of '06, Jakrapob Penkair claimed to have telephone recordings that exposed interference in the Court's decision to convict the EC commissioners. Penkair claimed the recording implied interference by Privy Councillor Prem Tinsulanonda.
Also after the coup, it was highly conspicuous that the junta ordered constitution increased the retirement age for court judges and changed the selection process for judges (a move which the Samak government have attempted to reverse).
Not long after the draft constitution began to take shape, the Constitutional Court disbanded the Thai Rak Thai party in a move which some claimed was politically motivated (however, the decision was certainly just).
And now, with many of the corruption charges against Thaksin and his family seemingly taking an eternity to reach court by moving steadily, the pastry gate scandal and the Preah Vihear temple affair have been resolved quickly.
What to make of this? It can't help but be noticed that the pastry gate affair, the PV temple affair and the PAD protests (which the court also made a decision on today) almost form a script for the next junta to use:
"In the interests of national security, the Council for the Protection of the Kingdom of Thailand with HM The King as Head of State has no decision but to step in and prevent the sale of Thai land by the People Power Party. Due to the protests lead by the PAD and the attempted interference in the judicial process by dark forces, we believe this decision is the only way to prevent Thai land being sold by dark forces, against the will of the people and the constitution of Thailand".
It must be noted however that the Courts of Thailand - particularly the Constitutional Court - have an image of being cleaner that the other two branches of government. Looking back, I can think of only one decision that appeared to disagree with my amateur understanding of Thai law. That case would be the Thaksin Shiniwat asset concealment case and, interestingly, a judge later admitted he had been "unsuccessfully lobbied" during that case. However, it is open to speculation as to how much influence and pressure is applied to the courts and by whom.
Whatever the reasons, expect the judiciary to continue to play a pivotal role as the ongoing political saga continues over the coming months. It gives me no pleasure to say that I predict a coup - with a speech resembling the example I just gave - around Christmas time this year.
Monday, June 23, 2008
Preah Vihear
Preah Vihear is a pleasant place to visit. The temple was the subject of a long running dispute between Thailand and Cambodia as to which nation the temple lies in (as it is actually on a border) and the ICJ judged it belonged to Cambodia.
That was years ago, now the temple is being used as yet another political football, since Cambodia's request to list the temple as a World Heritage site. When the Samak government rightly agreed to cede the temple (rather late) the nationalistic - some might say jingoistic - element of Thai culture was played up.
The opposition screamed that Thai land (all the few hundred square feet of it) was being "given up".
Then, when the House of Representatives appeared to drop pushes for constitutional amendments, the PAD claimed its campaign to remove Samak would continue due to the Preah Vihear case.
Now, with a censure motion looming, the PPP party's coalition partners are looking for an excuse to jump ship. The Puea Pandin party leader has instructed his MP's not to vote in favour of Samak if he "does not explain the Preah Vihear well".
In other words "distance yourselves lads, we need to be ready to jump if the ship goes down".
It's a shame that a temple is being used in such a way. But that's politics.
That was years ago, now the temple is being used as yet another political football, since Cambodia's request to list the temple as a World Heritage site. When the Samak government rightly agreed to cede the temple (rather late) the nationalistic - some might say jingoistic - element of Thai culture was played up.
The opposition screamed that Thai land (all the few hundred square feet of it) was being "given up".
Then, when the House of Representatives appeared to drop pushes for constitutional amendments, the PAD claimed its campaign to remove Samak would continue due to the Preah Vihear case.
Now, with a censure motion looming, the PPP party's coalition partners are looking for an excuse to jump ship. The Puea Pandin party leader has instructed his MP's not to vote in favour of Samak if he "does not explain the Preah Vihear well".
In other words "distance yourselves lads, we need to be ready to jump if the ship goes down".
It's a shame that a temple is being used in such a way. But that's politics.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Countdown to a redux?
Nationmultimedia.com has a live update on PAD movements as the group prepare to move towards government house. Key unions have joined the protest and various photos depict lines of riot police making final preparations.
Tensions are high, and amidst all of this Chavalit Yongchaiyudh has helpfully suggested that Samak could resign to ease the situation or a coup could achieve the same.
Of course, in either of these situations we would then need someone to step in and aid “national reconciliation”. Perhaps someone with both military and political experience. Perhaps Mr. Chavalit has someone in mind?
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
This could get nasty
The PAD announce a plan to "take" government house.
Samak responds by calling an urgent meeting and confirming the PAD will be blocked by police. Chamlong responds by saying the PAD will simply return.
I'm a fan of Chamlong (I was neutral on Sonthi before, but I will never forget him printing the address of Choksak on his web site) and I abhor Samak, but this is plan wrong.
How can a self proclaimed democratic group "take" government house? For what? What democratic mandate do they have? The belief that they are right? That's called dictatorship.
Keep watching.
Samak responds by calling an urgent meeting and confirming the PAD will be blocked by police. Chamlong responds by saying the PAD will simply return.
I'm a fan of Chamlong (I was neutral on Sonthi before, but I will never forget him printing the address of Choksak on his web site) and I abhor Samak, but this is plan wrong.
How can a self proclaimed democratic group "take" government house? For what? What democratic mandate do they have? The belief that they are right? That's called dictatorship.
Keep watching.
Sunday, June 01, 2008
Score one for the PAD
Source: gettyimages.com
Samak's comment that he would "disperse protesters with force ('if you want to try to resist, go ahead')" was a botch. Chamlong and co know well that the PM is famed for his temper and ill chosen words.
Chamlong responded to the threat by instructing PAD protesters (did I mention they are back on the streets?) to take cameras with them to the protest to capture any use of force for the world to see.
CNN reported it, and the PAD scored some propaganda points.
Samak left it to the equally charming Natthawut Saikua to spin it as "a tactical move, not a real threat"
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Nepotism
I'm at a loss for words for this one, so I will simply let the reports speak for themselves.
Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej said on Tuesday he has signed permission for Duang Yubamrung to return to the army, less than seven years after he was cashiered over accusations he was involved in the night club murder of a policeman."I do not know which office he will return to, but I already signed the approval," Mr Samak told reporters Tuesday. "It is effective now."
Duang, formerly known as Duangchalerm, is the son of Interior Minister Chalerm Yubamrung. He was dismissed from the army in October, 2001, after the murder of a policeman inside a Ratchadaphisek night club.
He was removed from his post and stripped of his rank after he failed to report for work within 15 days.
He fled to Malaysia to avoid murder charges. After almost a year on the run, he surrendered for trial. He was acquitted of the murder charge by the Criminal Court.
After his acquital, police did not seek another suspect, and there have been no other arrests. Several witnesses who testified said they had received threatening telephone calls to warn them not to tell what they had seen, and no direct testimony ever was admitted.
"He was a soldier. Now his (criminal) case is over so there is no problem for him to return to the army," Mr Samak said.
Duang's brother Wan, previously known as Wanchalerm, also got permission from Mr Samak to take a posotion in the new government, where his father is a minister. Public Health Minister Chaiya Saosomsab promoted him to be Mr Happy Toilet, to teach Bangkokians how to use the loo.
Together, during the 1990s, the Yubamrung brothers were well known to, and openly reviled by Bangkok society for a series of violent confrontations in night clubs. Cases brought to trial always wound up with lack of witnesses.
And from The Nation:
Supatra Rodwimut, wife of murdered Sergeant Suwichai Rodwimut, said she was shocked. "I have no words to describe how I feel. I'm just an ordinary woman. I have no power to fight. I hope one day the sin he committed will catch up with him."
Supreme Commander General Boonsrang Niampradit declined to comment, saying he has yet to be informed.
There is more about the history of the saga here (H/T Bangkok Pundit).
Monday, April 07, 2008
Quote of the week
"He should have looked in the mirror to see how much he has degraded, how time has changed his facial look. What he did hasn't done much benefit to the country. It's just a show of ego,"
Samak "armored car" Sundaravej , in today's Nation, blissfully unaware of his own irony as he talks about fortune tellers and superstition, something he knows a bit about himself.
Friday, March 21, 2008
Samak: the good, the bad and the ugly
So this is Songkarn and what have we done?
Well, if your name is Samak Sanderejev and you are Prime Minister of Thailand, you have done quite a lot. The PPP have been a busy bunch since they finally entered office in January (almost a month after they actually won the election) and to the surprise of many, they have actually done some things quite well. Here's my little review of the good, the bad and the ugly from Mr Samak.
The Good:
1) The idea of legalising casinos. It's been heavily opposed in some quarters but the reality is that legalisation of gambling is progressive and correct. In a country where people who want to gamble already do so and Jao Phoa already have their casinos up and running, it is only practical to make the business and maybe even take some tax money for good causes.
2) Expedition of mass transport projects. OK, so we all know that there is a direct link between high budget transport construction and financial kickbacks. Still, the City of Angels is desperately crying out for an extended transport network, and the new government seem serious about getting it speeded up, whatever the reasons for the eagerness may be.
3) Refusing to negotiate with terrorist leaders in the deep south.
It may well be a face saving measure to mask the fact that intelligence sources cannot trace these people anyway but that is irrelevant. Samak is absolutely correct when he says that the government should not negotiate with people who "kill their own" in the most brutal manner possible.
4) Tax breaks. With the plummeting dollar and rising costs of living adding to an economy that had already been stagnant since the coup the tax breaks should be the perfect catalyst to get people out spending again.
The Bad:
1) Transferring good officers.
I've heard people say "Well nobody protested when the junta bought in their own people" which may be true. But the key point here is that Seripisuth Temiyavej and Dr Siriwat Thiptaradon were good at their jobs. It may be normal for a new government to bring in new people, but is it right to let the public suffer when the 'new people' are bought in under false pretences and most likely are not as skilled as their predecessors?
2) Starving the AEC.
If anybody was in any doubt who has come out smiling form the struggle between the junta and the PPP, they only had to read today's story stating that the Assets Examination Committee are "requesting public donations". The PPP were never going to allow the AEC to continue their work, and they have achieved this by starving them of funds. As such, it is likely that politicians who did something wrong will not be prosecuted.
3) Disrespecting the victims of the 1976 massacre AND the victims of the Burmese Junta.
And this, sadly, nullifies any achievements of K. Sanmak. When he told a CNN reporter that "Only one person was killed" and compounded this by expressing sympathy for the Burmese Junta because "They are Buddhists" one can only wonder what was going through his mind. By reinventing history and showing such blatant disregard for the rights of his own people, Samak send us a reminder that for all the rhetoric and progressive manoeuvres, he is still the same person inside.
Well, if your name is Samak Sanderejev and you are Prime Minister of Thailand, you have done quite a lot. The PPP have been a busy bunch since they finally entered office in January (almost a month after they actually won the election) and to the surprise of many, they have actually done some things quite well. Here's my little review of the good, the bad and the ugly from Mr Samak.
The Good:
1) The idea of legalising casinos. It's been heavily opposed in some quarters but the reality is that legalisation of gambling is progressive and correct. In a country where people who want to gamble already do so and Jao Phoa already have their casinos up and running, it is only practical to make the business and maybe even take some tax money for good causes.
2) Expedition of mass transport projects. OK, so we all know that there is a direct link between high budget transport construction and financial kickbacks. Still, the City of Angels is desperately crying out for an extended transport network, and the new government seem serious about getting it speeded up, whatever the reasons for the eagerness may be.
3) Refusing to negotiate with terrorist leaders in the deep south.
It may well be a face saving measure to mask the fact that intelligence sources cannot trace these people anyway but that is irrelevant. Samak is absolutely correct when he says that the government should not negotiate with people who "kill their own" in the most brutal manner possible.
4) Tax breaks. With the plummeting dollar and rising costs of living adding to an economy that had already been stagnant since the coup the tax breaks should be the perfect catalyst to get people out spending again.
The Bad:
1) Transferring good officers.
I've heard people say "Well nobody protested when the junta bought in their own people" which may be true. But the key point here is that Seripisuth Temiyavej and Dr Siriwat Thiptaradon were good at their jobs. It may be normal for a new government to bring in new people, but is it right to let the public suffer when the 'new people' are bought in under false pretences and most likely are not as skilled as their predecessors?
2) Starving the AEC.
If anybody was in any doubt who has come out smiling form the struggle between the junta and the PPP, they only had to read today's story stating that the Assets Examination Committee are "requesting public donations". The PPP were never going to allow the AEC to continue their work, and they have achieved this by starving them of funds. As such, it is likely that politicians who did something wrong will not be prosecuted.
3) Disrespecting the victims of the 1976 massacre AND the victims of the Burmese Junta.
And this, sadly, nullifies any achievements of K. Sanmak. When he told a CNN reporter that "Only one person was killed" and compounded this by expressing sympathy for the Burmese Junta because "They are Buddhists" one can only wonder what was going through his mind. By reinventing history and showing such blatant disregard for the rights of his own people, Samak send us a reminder that for all the rhetoric and progressive manoeuvres, he is still the same person inside.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
So what has been happening?
Apologies for my lack of blogging as of late. There have been rumours - I can nether confirm nor deny them - that this is due to my second purchase of an Xbox360.
Note that the 'old money' elite have been deafening by their silence during all of this. This is not due to their love of democracy or patience with the PPP. This is simply waiting for a chance to strike. Anupong Paochinda's call for everyone to allow Thaksin to return simply echoes of Sondhi's promise that there would not be a coup.
Also of note is Pracha Prasopdee's threat to drive PAD leaders out of Thailand if they protest again. Prasopdee says this would be done for "stability", his verdict is an interesting contrast to the constitution's promise that people can protest peacefully, weather Prasopdee likes it or not.
- Chalerm has given a job to one of his charming sons.
- Yongyuth "the refrigerator" Tiyapairat has been charged by the ECC for vote buying.
- Thaksin is due to return now that the undermining of the judicial system has begun.
Note that the 'old money' elite have been deafening by their silence during all of this. This is not due to their love of democracy or patience with the PPP. This is simply waiting for a chance to strike. Anupong Paochinda's call for everyone to allow Thaksin to return simply echoes of Sondhi's promise that there would not be a coup.
Also of note is Pracha Prasopdee's threat to drive PAD leaders out of Thailand if they protest again. Prasopdee says this would be done for "stability", his verdict is an interesting contrast to the constitution's promise that people can protest peacefully, weather Prasopdee likes it or not.
Monday, January 28, 2008
And it goes on....
Over a month after the election and after much power brooking, bargaining and sedition, Samak was finally confirmed as PM today. His name will be submitted for royal approval.
One question remains: how will the new parliament form legislation without the senate? As the senate is not due to be confirmed for some time, are the new MP's unable to do anything before then?
A month late parliament. A lower house without an upper house, it all seems a mess.
One question remains: how will the new parliament form legislation without the senate? As the senate is not due to be confirmed for some time, are the new MP's unable to do anything before then?
A month late parliament. A lower house without an upper house, it all seems a mess.
Sunday, January 20, 2008
National unity: it's what they all care about
"We can talk........for the purpose of social reconciliation."
CNS Chief Anupong Paochinda after Potjamon Shinwatra suddenly decided to return to Thailand to clear charges against her.
"If he were a convict, he would surely face a life sentence or worse, because everything he has done has been premeditated,"
Snoh Thienthong during the anti-Thaksin protests
"I want the country to move ahead following a turbulent period."
Pracharaj leader Snoh Thienthong after weeks of negotiating for the right to some of the most lucrative cabinet posts in the new government headed by a confessed Thaksin nominee.
"My party's utmost concern is forging national reconciliation in order to restore normalcy as soon as possible"
Puea Pandin leader Suwit Khunkitti, after weeks of negotiating for the right to some of the most lucrative cabinet posts in the new government.
"Conflicts in the past should not be kept forever but they should be set aside so that everything can be done for the sake of the country"
Chart Thai leader (and one of Thailand's worst PM's ever) Banharn Silipa-archa after weeks of negotiating for the right to some of the most lucrative cabinet posts in the new government.
Aren't we lucky that so many powerful people have nothing but greed and lies national unity at heart?
CNS Chief Anupong Paochinda after Potjamon Shinwatra suddenly decided to return to Thailand to clear charges against her.
"If he were a convict, he would surely face a life sentence or worse, because everything he has done has been premeditated,"
Snoh Thienthong during the anti-Thaksin protests
"I want the country to move ahead following a turbulent period."
Pracharaj leader Snoh Thienthong after weeks of negotiating for the right to some of the most lucrative cabinet posts in the new government headed by a confessed Thaksin nominee.
"My party's utmost concern is forging national reconciliation in order to restore normalcy as soon as possible"
Puea Pandin leader Suwit Khunkitti, after weeks of negotiating for the right to some of the most lucrative cabinet posts in the new government.
"Conflicts in the past should not be kept forever but they should be set aside so that everything can be done for the sake of the country"
Chart Thai leader (and one of Thailand's worst PM's ever) Banharn Silipa-archa after weeks of negotiating for the right to some of the most lucrative cabinet posts in the new government.
Aren't we lucky that so many powerful people have
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Thaksin COULD return.......
Given that Samak and his PPP have finally set themselves up for a coalition government, it appears that amnesty for the one hundred and eleven banned Thai Rak Thai executives is coming soon.
Now here's an interesting point: the new constitution stipulates (part 9) that cabinet members cannot vote in house motions. So, if Samak uses his PPP members in a cabinet, his coalition is dangerously low on majority.
Can you see where this is going?
It is conceivable that Samak could form his cabinet entirely from former TRT execs!
How long would it take for the amnesty to take effect? A new senate must be appointed first (and may fight the move) but then, a new senate is needed to approve a new PM anyway.
Is it conceivable that Thaksin could come to the cabinet? He is under summons but has not been found guilty. (However, section 96 of the constitution does state that a minister cannot be appointed if he has had property confiscated by court for being unusally wealthy.)
How would opponents of the government - in all their guises - react to this? Could the military accept this slap in he face?
This is not a thought to be scoffed at. It makes perfect sense for Samak. He strengthens his coalition, increases his party's popularity, gains expertise and gives the proverbial finger to the military.
The controversy would be huge, surely? Could it happen?
Now here's an interesting point: the new constitution stipulates (part 9) that cabinet members cannot vote in house motions. So, if Samak uses his PPP members in a cabinet, his coalition is dangerously low on majority.
Can you see where this is going?
It is conceivable that Samak could form his cabinet entirely from former TRT execs!
How long would it take for the amnesty to take effect? A new senate must be appointed first (and may fight the move) but then, a new senate is needed to approve a new PM anyway.
Is it conceivable that Thaksin could come to the cabinet? He is under summons but has not been found guilty. (However, section 96 of the constitution does state that a minister cannot be appointed if he has had property confiscated by court for being unusally wealthy.)
How would opponents of the government - in all their guises - react to this? Could the military accept this slap in he face?
This is not a thought to be scoffed at. It makes perfect sense for Samak. He strengthens his coalition, increases his party's popularity, gains expertise and gives the proverbial finger to the military.
The controversy would be huge, surely? Could it happen?
Sunday, December 23, 2007
Thailand, for whom the bell tolls
Latest exit polls show that this man is likely to be the next prime minister of Thailand:
"You smack me and I'll smack you back"
To corruption investigators
"Did you have sinful sex last night?"
In the holy language of Sanskrit, to a journalist
After the Thammasat Massacre of 1976, Samak happily ordered the banning of some 200 plus books that were a ....yep, you guessed it......."threat to national security".
One of his close aides in the party is Chalerm Yoobamrung.
The thoughts of Anek Laothamatas ring loudly in my ears. I find it hard to keep hope, but it is the rape of democracy that got us here in the first place.Now the people have given the biggest possible middle finger to the military and their aides (hidden or not) , but in doing so, have given the military a perfect incentive for another ku. they have elected the most arrogant, incompetent and "allegedly" corrupt proxy possible. Thaksin without any of the intelligence.
So Thailand faces four years under this man - as well as Thaksin getting away scot free for his crimes and being welcomed back as a hero - or the army and other forces (who cannot be named despite their role in this farce) wait for the PPP to show their corruptness and incompetence and then stage another coup to take us back to stage one.
Is there any way out? Only if a coalition is formed between ALL the opposition parties.
"You smack me and I'll smack you back"
To corruption investigators
"Did you have sinful sex last night?"
In the holy language of Sanskrit, to a journalist
After the Thammasat Massacre of 1976, Samak happily ordered the banning of some 200 plus books that were a ....yep, you guessed it......."threat to national security".
One of his close aides in the party is Chalerm Yoobamrung.
The thoughts of Anek Laothamatas ring loudly in my ears. I find it hard to keep hope, but it is the rape of democracy that got us here in the first place.Now the people have given the biggest possible middle finger to the military and their aides (hidden or not) , but in doing so, have given the military a perfect incentive for another ku. they have elected the most arrogant, incompetent and "allegedly" corrupt proxy possible. Thaksin without any of the intelligence.
So Thailand faces four years under this man - as well as Thaksin getting away scot free for his crimes and being welcomed back as a hero - or the army and other forces (who cannot be named despite their role in this farce) wait for the PPP to show their corruptness and incompetence and then stage another coup to take us back to stage one.
Is there any way out? Only if a coalition is formed between ALL the opposition parties.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Taking Thailand forward: Abhisit at the FCCT
Abhisit Vejajiva began late at the FCCT, stating that he had lost his voice but was lucky to be alive after his car crash yesterday.
"Thai people have faced hardship for the last three years due to bad economic practices. People lost their voice after the coup"
"Samak puts politics first and people second. Debate is important not for us or PPP but for the people. Samak has refused every offer of a debate"
Abhisit enquires whether Samak was invited to the FCCT. MC Jonathon Head says he was, but was unable to attend so he is now serving food fro the kitchen tonight (laughter).
"The Democrats have a ninety nine day plan, it is not a gimmick. It includes polices such as free education all through school, an end to corruption and reversal of confusing policies for foreign investors"
"We will happily form a coalition with anyone.....(pause) ......except the PPP" [laughter]
Questions:
1) Have there been any kind of deals or agreements between the Democrats and the military?
AV: No. Why would the Dems spend so much money on pre coup elections if they knew what would happen? Why do the PPP/TRT suddenly become so in love with democracy when they have lost power?
2) [A foreign election monitor volunteer] There are allegations of vote rigging by the CNS in Chang Mai
AV: Report it to the EC. However, these elections are fairer than 2005.
3) Why are parties putting politics before people?
AV: The party hopping mentality is to blame. Nobody can take politics seriously when people move freely between parties. There are some encouraging signs that this mentality is changing.
4) (The Nation) What do you think about the undemocratic aspects of the constitution and security laws?
AV: I have pushed for amendments in the past and I wish to remove undemocratic aspects of the new constitution such as half the senate being unelected. I hope the NLA don't pass the security law. My message to the NLA is "take a break".
If they do pass the law, I have four issues to raise including a definition of ""threat to security" (a reference to part of the new law which gives emergency powers to the military at any time of "threat to national security").
The military have learned a lesson, now they know seizing power was the easy part of the job.
5) (UN representative) We need a debate on human rights. Will the Dems check on human rights abuses in the south?
AV: There was a debate on human rights a few weeks ago by the Human Rights Commission of Thailand. All party leaders were invited, I was the only attendant.
The troubles in the south are complex. The old hierarchy in the south is no more. The old leaders do not have a vertical line of command. We will encourage dialogue but it is a local problem, we have extensive plans to resolve issues in the south.
6) (Bangkok Post) Polls show a swing to PPP. Will heads roll if the Dems don't get in? If you get in, what are the first three issues you will tackle?
AV: I advise Bangkok Post not to do internet polls [laughter]. There is a group of full time political operatives on the sixth floor of a building in Wangtonla who are hired by a certain party.
We have set standards in the party, I expect those standards to be met.
The first three issues I will tackle are economic confidence, reducing the cost of living and stimulating the economy.
7) Are there family ties between the Shinwatras and the Vejajivas?
AV: Thaksin's mother in law made this claim [that there were links between the families about three generations ago] but I have checked and there are no blood ties.
8) (A Thai teacher) We are not happy about the situation with universities being pushed to become autonomous.
AV: My colleague Wijit supports this motion. I disagree with him. However, autonomy is not the same as privatisation.
9) What is the meaning of the Democrat logo? [A woman washing her long hair]
AV: It is a goddess, we like to think she is washing out political dirt [laughter].
10) Would you form a coalition even if the PPP win a clear majority? When will we know the shape of the government?
AV: If PPP win outright, we will work hard as the opposition. If not, we will form a coalition.
We should see shape of government by Sunday evening, if there are issues with red cards, etc. it could take thirty days. There is a quorum but it is not a full house quorum.
11) What will you do to sway those who are still undecided?
The indecision is due to political noise. I believe the undecideds will focus on the real issues when voting.
12) (Jonathon Head) What is your stance on privatisation?
AV:The privatisation of EGAT and PTT by Thai Rak Thai was illegal.This has spoiled a policy that can benefit the nation. Thailand has underutilised assets.
13) (Japanese press) Why do so many rural folk still go for TRT/PPP and Thaksin after eighteen months? Why have the Dems not reached out to these people?
AV: They have sympathies with the one hundred and eleven TRT execs who are banned. I have sympathy with some of them as they didn't know what was going on with the crimes committed.
Apart from the south, we had just fourteen seats in the previous house, now we are very competitive. This shows we have made gains.
14) Would you consider autonomy for Pattiani under any circumstances? Previous coalitions have always been weak, can you be sure yours won't crumble?
AV: Our research and that of the investigative group led by Anand has the same conclusion: autonomy is not a demand from people in the south. What they want is justice, including corrections to past injustices. Autonomy for Pattiani would not help other states. De-centralisation is the key.
Previous coalitions were corrupt and/or incompetent. We will not be. A good government cannot be toppled.
15) What is your stance on the PPP using Thaksin's image and name? If the PPP was dissolved for electoral malpractice, what would your stance be?
AV: PPP candidates have every right to use Thaksin's image and name, however they [the 111 dissolved TRT execs] should not interfere with the running of PPP.
I hope the EC will not destabilise politics by any bias actions. I don't believe PPP will be dissolved.
16) [Narcissus] What is your position on Burma? Should ASEAN do more?
AV:I am appalled by the actions of the junta in Burma. ASEAN should do more but they should take careful actions.
17) There is too much rubbish in the Bangkok canals!
AV: I'll tell Apirak! [Laughter]. It's not as bad as it used to be and I will get the council to do more.
18) Is there a political ideology for the labor movement in Thailand? Do the Dems have a separate section to deal with this?
AV: No labor focused ideologies really exist in Thailand. Some attempts to set up a labor party have failed. Dems take a balanced approach between labor and service sector approaches.
19) The new constitution has strengthened the opposition to prevent another TRT style government stranglehold. Will this weaken a coalition government?
AV: Don't over estimate constitutional power.The previous constitution had more human rights than ever but resulted in more abuses than ever by TRT.
There will not be many medium sized parties from now on, maybe none atall. Thailand is moving towards a two party state. [Re-iterates reasons why his coalition government will be stable].
End of questions. I get a couple of pictures with the man himself.
My verdict: Abhisit is slick, highly articulate and progressive. However it is easy to see why he does not appeal to certain Thais. He lacks that abrasive spark or traditional Thai political demeanour that some sections of Thailand go for. He also likes to talk technically - albeit with the usual vagueness of politicos - and that will simply turn some people off.
A good politician for sure, but one that will only appeal to middle or upper class Thais. A clear class division in Thailand is still evident in the people's political choices.
"Thai people have faced hardship for the last three years due to bad economic practices. People lost their voice after the coup"
"Samak puts politics first and people second. Debate is important not for us or PPP but for the people. Samak has refused every offer of a debate"
Abhisit enquires whether Samak was invited to the FCCT. MC Jonathon Head says he was, but was unable to attend so he is now serving food fro the kitchen tonight (laughter).
"The Democrats have a ninety nine day plan, it is not a gimmick. It includes polices such as free education all through school, an end to corruption and reversal of confusing policies for foreign investors"
"We will happily form a coalition with anyone.....(pause) ......except the PPP" [laughter]
Questions:
1) Have there been any kind of deals or agreements between the Democrats and the military?
AV: No. Why would the Dems spend so much money on pre coup elections if they knew what would happen? Why do the PPP/TRT suddenly become so in love with democracy when they have lost power?
2) [A foreign election monitor volunteer] There are allegations of vote rigging by the CNS in Chang Mai
AV: Report it to the EC. However, these elections are fairer than 2005.
3) Why are parties putting politics before people?
AV: The party hopping mentality is to blame. Nobody can take politics seriously when people move freely between parties. There are some encouraging signs that this mentality is changing.
4) (The Nation) What do you think about the undemocratic aspects of the constitution and security laws?
AV: I have pushed for amendments in the past and I wish to remove undemocratic aspects of the new constitution such as half the senate being unelected. I hope the NLA don't pass the security law. My message to the NLA is "take a break".
If they do pass the law, I have four issues to raise including a definition of ""threat to security" (a reference to part of the new law which gives emergency powers to the military at any time of "threat to national security").
The military have learned a lesson, now they know seizing power was the easy part of the job.
5) (UN representative) We need a debate on human rights. Will the Dems check on human rights abuses in the south?
AV: There was a debate on human rights a few weeks ago by the Human Rights Commission of Thailand. All party leaders were invited, I was the only attendant.
The troubles in the south are complex. The old hierarchy in the south is no more. The old leaders do not have a vertical line of command. We will encourage dialogue but it is a local problem, we have extensive plans to resolve issues in the south.
6) (Bangkok Post) Polls show a swing to PPP. Will heads roll if the Dems don't get in? If you get in, what are the first three issues you will tackle?
AV: I advise Bangkok Post not to do internet polls [laughter]. There is a group of full time political operatives on the sixth floor of a building in Wangtonla who are hired by a certain party.
We have set standards in the party, I expect those standards to be met.
The first three issues I will tackle are economic confidence, reducing the cost of living and stimulating the economy.
7) Are there family ties between the Shinwatras and the Vejajivas?
AV: Thaksin's mother in law made this claim [that there were links between the families about three generations ago] but I have checked and there are no blood ties.
8) (A Thai teacher) We are not happy about the situation with universities being pushed to become autonomous.
AV: My colleague Wijit supports this motion. I disagree with him. However, autonomy is not the same as privatisation.
9) What is the meaning of the Democrat logo? [A woman washing her long hair]
AV: It is a goddess, we like to think she is washing out political dirt [laughter].
10) Would you form a coalition even if the PPP win a clear majority? When will we know the shape of the government?
AV: If PPP win outright, we will work hard as the opposition. If not, we will form a coalition.
We should see shape of government by Sunday evening, if there are issues with red cards, etc. it could take thirty days. There is a quorum but it is not a full house quorum.
11) What will you do to sway those who are still undecided?
The indecision is due to political noise. I believe the undecideds will focus on the real issues when voting.
12) (Jonathon Head) What is your stance on privatisation?
AV:The privatisation of EGAT and PTT by Thai Rak Thai was illegal.This has spoiled a policy that can benefit the nation. Thailand has underutilised assets.
13) (Japanese press) Why do so many rural folk still go for TRT/PPP and Thaksin after eighteen months? Why have the Dems not reached out to these people?
AV: They have sympathies with the one hundred and eleven TRT execs who are banned. I have sympathy with some of them as they didn't know what was going on with the crimes committed.
Apart from the south, we had just fourteen seats in the previous house, now we are very competitive. This shows we have made gains.
14) Would you consider autonomy for Pattiani under any circumstances? Previous coalitions have always been weak, can you be sure yours won't crumble?
AV: Our research and that of the investigative group led by Anand has the same conclusion: autonomy is not a demand from people in the south. What they want is justice, including corrections to past injustices. Autonomy for Pattiani would not help other states. De-centralisation is the key.
Previous coalitions were corrupt and/or incompetent. We will not be. A good government cannot be toppled.
15) What is your stance on the PPP using Thaksin's image and name? If the PPP was dissolved for electoral malpractice, what would your stance be?
AV: PPP candidates have every right to use Thaksin's image and name, however they [the 111 dissolved TRT execs] should not interfere with the running of PPP.
I hope the EC will not destabilise politics by any bias actions. I don't believe PPP will be dissolved.
16) [Narcissus] What is your position on Burma? Should ASEAN do more?
AV:I am appalled by the actions of the junta in Burma. ASEAN should do more but they should take careful actions.
17) There is too much rubbish in the Bangkok canals!
AV: I'll tell Apirak! [Laughter]. It's not as bad as it used to be and I will get the council to do more.
18) Is there a political ideology for the labor movement in Thailand? Do the Dems have a separate section to deal with this?
AV: No labor focused ideologies really exist in Thailand. Some attempts to set up a labor party have failed. Dems take a balanced approach between labor and service sector approaches.
19) The new constitution has strengthened the opposition to prevent another TRT style government stranglehold. Will this weaken a coalition government?
AV: Don't over estimate constitutional power.The previous constitution had more human rights than ever but resulted in more abuses than ever by TRT.
There will not be many medium sized parties from now on, maybe none atall. Thailand is moving towards a two party state. [Re-iterates reasons why his coalition government will be stable].
End of questions. I get a couple of pictures with the man himself.
My verdict: Abhisit is slick, highly articulate and progressive. However it is easy to see why he does not appeal to certain Thais. He lacks that abrasive spark or traditional Thai political demeanour that some sections of Thailand go for. He also likes to talk technically - albeit with the usual vagueness of politicos - and that will simply turn some people off.
A good politician for sure, but one that will only appeal to middle or upper class Thais. A clear class division in Thailand is still evident in the people's political choices.
Thursday, November 08, 2007
The sort of people involved in Thai politics Pt.2
Is Samak , read what he did today here.
Not to compare him with TSOPITP number one, but he is still indicative.
Samak shows us then when you the press actually ask you a difficult question, you can be rude and ridiculous back to them. Even when you are a fat, ugly, boisterous old man and the reporter doing her job is a young woman.
And this is the man who could be the next PM? Buddha help us. Whatever people think of Abhisit, he is above this kind of mental guttersnipe.
UPDATE: No remorse from Samak.
Not to compare him with TSOPITP number one, but he is still indicative.
Samak shows us then when you the press actually ask you a difficult question, you can be rude and ridiculous back to them. Even when you are a fat, ugly, boisterous old man and the reporter doing her job is a young woman.
And this is the man who could be the next PM? Buddha help us. Whatever people think of Abhisit, he is above this kind of mental guttersnipe.
UPDATE: No remorse from Samak.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
